The Solution to Resolving Government Contract Disputes
At Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, our construction law attorneys have considerable experience in advising clients on a full range of matters related to local, state and federal government entities. Since 1989, our California offices have been guiding clients at all levels of the contract process:
- Bid structuring
- Contract formation
- Bid protests
- Contract claims
- Contract disputes and breach of contract
- Contract dispute resolution
- Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP California offices
Help Is a Phone Call Away: 1-800-832-6946. Contact us online.
The Company offers skilled and knowledgeable litigation services relating to complex government contract disputes that include everything from bid protests through post-project construction conflicts.
If you do not file a government claim in a timely fashion, your right to the claim is waived. Contact an experienced government contracts dispute law firm to help you successfully resolve your government claim.
Clients involved in government construction disputes include construction companies, contractors and subcontractors, engineering and design firms, government suppliers that are domestic and internationally based, and others. Issues may involve disputes over defective plans and specifications, faulty products or other construction-related matters.
Clients Benefit From Our Resources and Credibility
The firm's lawyers assist our government contractor clients with wage-hour and labor matters under federal laws such as the Davis-Bacon Act and the Service Contract Act. Combining our departments' individual expertise gives the Firm's Clients timely assistance with any government contract problem, whether it initially appears to be a "contract problem" or a "labor problem".
*CV, BV, and AV are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards, and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards.
